1. In regards to how a user is allowed to react to verbal threats.
   There are two types of threats, an 'Active Threat' and a 'Idle threat'. Users may kill for an active threat but they may not kill for an idle a threat.
   The difference between the two is situational but will always pertain to if the person making the threats has a weapon in their hand.
   For example, someone pointing a gun at you and threatening to kill you. This is an Active threat.
   Someone saying they will kill/beat you in an argument or conversation. (Unarmed, weapon on safety etc) that is an idle threat.
   You are allowed to react to an Active threat in that moment. I was not an active threat and have seen people warned for this before I was told that he is allowed to shoot me in the legs even if I am not a threat to him when asking for the rule that says this I was told "Your cop baiting" This cop was already given a verbal warning for the second clip I linked and should know not to shoot people for no reason or kill them unless there is another rule that states that what this cop has been doing is allowed then this seems like blatant RDM to me, This cop has been targeting me for weeks for no apparent reason and seems to have a personal vendetta against me which reaches out of just RP. My point being just because you are a cop doesn't mean you can shoot someone for a invalid reason.
   

(03-23-2024, 11:31 PM)anzati1 Wrote: hate to side with the guy, but pd go past server rules and it turns into an IC issue of excessive force, 2nd clip has ZERO context, you could've had an rpg out 2 seconds prior and killed 50 people but there is no context given.
SOP states the second anyone is considered a danger to other people or yourself, you have full right to injure their legs, taze, baton, and even kill them right there on the spot. Don't think you're invincible just to be a minge.