07-13-2023, 11:28 PM
I was not involved in the PK at all, but I want to quote a rule.
Killing Rules No. 3
"In regards to how a user is allowed to react to verbal threats.
There are two types of threats, an 'Active Threat' and a 'Idle threat'. Users may kill for an active threat but they may not kill for an idle a threat.
The difference between the two is situational but will always pertain to if the person making the threats has a weapon in their hand.
For example, someone pointing a gun at you and threatening to kill you. This is an Active threat.
Someone saying they will kill/beat you in an argument or conversation. (Unarmed, weapon on safety etc) that is an idle threat."
So technically, no PK and the person who shot him actually broke the rules if it went down as stated by Lupo.
Killing Rules No. 3
"In regards to how a user is allowed to react to verbal threats.
There are two types of threats, an 'Active Threat' and a 'Idle threat'. Users may kill for an active threat but they may not kill for an idle a threat.
The difference between the two is situational but will always pertain to if the person making the threats has a weapon in their hand.
For example, someone pointing a gun at you and threatening to kill you. This is an Active threat.
Someone saying they will kill/beat you in an argument or conversation. (Unarmed, weapon on safety etc) that is an idle threat."
So technically, no PK and the person who shot him actually broke the rules if it went down as stated by Lupo.
![[Image: DgVCQ_2XUAAX2VM.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DgVCQ_2XUAAX2VM.jpg)