12-07-2023, 02:16 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-07-2023, 02:29 AM by ayo. Edited 1 time in total.)
(12-07-2023, 01:57 AM)darkfire Wrote: Hello I was the Admin handling this situation/
The reason I made it longer is because you kept saying you knew the rules you read them 4X and was sure you didn't do anything wrong. UA joined the VC support channel and heard the case as well as watched the video and agreed it was indeed RDM. You do have a very lengthy list of notes and bans but they were a while back. If you read the rules a 5th time id say a reduction is the fair thing to do. Please read the SOP as well so you can further understand how that situation could have ended differently.
Yes, I was aware that if someone was under FearRP they could not move. My character/I came into the situation being told that the player was shooting at officers, so that is why I didn't have a taser as my character was pursing them alone. The character continued to evade, so I shot. Thinking it was within reason because of the FearRP guidelines, which the UA member did agree too (That cops can place people under FearRP). The player did break FearRP, admittedly; so we're both in the wrong.
The reason to why I kept saying I have read the rules is because I was saying that I believed since the player broke FearRP I was able to engage them, you insisted that cops could not place people under FearRP. UA, joined, and denied that. The only reason in which UA agreed for it to be RDM is because my character was a cop, but he did shoot down your opinion of 'Cops can't place people under FearRP'. The player did break FearRP, I engaged, but because my character was a cop it counted as RDM. I was unaware of that part, as it is not necessarily stated in the rules - this is why you called UAAs we, including the two staff members were unsure of it it really was a rule break.
I wasn't spouting on about how I knew every rule, it was me saying "I read the rules and I don't see anything specific regarding a situation similar to this." No admin knew if it was RDM, its why UA was called and when called they did agree, cops can place players under FearRP. The actual player who called the sit, went to even butt their video and cut the part of me being within touchign distance of them, at gunpoint. Which you found, later on.
.
TL;DR. All of us (Me, you, Poision) were unsure so we had to get UA to determine if it was a rulebreak, UA agreed it was RDM but also agreed the player broke FearRP. I thought because they broke FearRP, I could engage, I did not know it would be RDM. There isn't a defintive rule for this situation, which is why I am apologizing, as I was unsure but did make sure to read the rules before I did play.