As the person involved in the scenario, I don't think approving the PK appeal is the proper decision. What he's saying and what occurred don't coincide. If he thought the reason to break fearrp was that we're in public doing a robbery, why did he quote NLR during the situation? He also said himself he was off for an hour in between the two events, so how would NLR apply? Whether I was going to rob him (I wasn't) or not really doesn't effect the scenario at all. I pulled a gun on him, ordered him over to a house, and he just said "NLR NLR." Lol? I understand his account is in good standing, but that doesn't change the fact his character made a dumb decision and he should be responsible for those actions. If he knew we weren't able to run his pockets right there in public (which is what he's alleging) then he clearly read the rules. That would mean he was fully aware of fear rp.
He took all the rewards of robbing people, but wasn't willing to accept any of the repercussions of it. Frankly, I think this is a good lesson on why not to mug. If you rob people, expect some form of consequence.
Also, if you're going to mug people, don't tell them your name? Lol.
He took all the rewards of robbing people, but wasn't willing to accept any of the repercussions of it. Frankly, I think this is a good lesson on why not to mug. If you rob people, expect some form of consequence.
Also, if you're going to mug people, don't tell them your name? Lol.