05-04-2022, 03:00 AM
Hello!
I'm the banning staff member.
You were banned after you ran into town hall during the inauguration event, jumped up on the stage, and shouted that you were the best and that you were unstoppable. Police then escorted you out, and Bingus kicked you from the server. Due to having interacted with you before and your small PO, I issued a six hour ban. Multiple warnings had been given in OOC chat to everyone on the server that mingery would not be tolerated, and would result in punishment. You then pinged me in the main discord's general chat, demanding I remove the ban and insisting I had mistaken you for someone else. I replied that you had run into town hall and punched a candidate; this reply was incorrect, you did not punch anyone, however several minges had run into the building and done that, leading to the mistaken reply; however, at the time the ban was issued, I was aware you had not punched anyone, and it did not affect the decision to issue punishment, or the duration of punishment. Two of your friends insisted that you had done nothing wrong, on the basis that you did not wear the clothing that other minges had worn when punchminging. These statements have no bearing on the decision, as a video exists that shows you running into town hall and shouting, and because their statements are based on the assumption you had punched people. I informed a friend of yours who inquired that my DMs were open. In the following exchange, I admitted this minor mistake, and mentioned explicitly to you that it had no bearing on the punishment, a statement that you mysteriously left out of this appeal, and which is included in the below attachments. As for your first attachment, neither me nor Bingus stated you were a white male in a suit, only the unrelated people in general chat said this.
In conclusion, while yes a minor error was made in describing your offense in the general chat, it was completely unrelated to your punishment, and the idea you had been punching people emerged only after the ban, and had no effect on it. The statements of others in general chat are based on the assumption that you had been punchminging, which you weren't, and as such cannot be relied upon as a statement of your innocence.
If you have any further questions, I'm more than happy to reply and explain why this ban was valid regardless of a minor post-ban error and what two randoms in general chat said.
I'm the banning staff member.
You were banned after you ran into town hall during the inauguration event, jumped up on the stage, and shouted that you were the best and that you were unstoppable. Police then escorted you out, and Bingus kicked you from the server. Due to having interacted with you before and your small PO, I issued a six hour ban. Multiple warnings had been given in OOC chat to everyone on the server that mingery would not be tolerated, and would result in punishment. You then pinged me in the main discord's general chat, demanding I remove the ban and insisting I had mistaken you for someone else. I replied that you had run into town hall and punched a candidate; this reply was incorrect, you did not punch anyone, however several minges had run into the building and done that, leading to the mistaken reply; however, at the time the ban was issued, I was aware you had not punched anyone, and it did not affect the decision to issue punishment, or the duration of punishment. Two of your friends insisted that you had done nothing wrong, on the basis that you did not wear the clothing that other minges had worn when punchminging. These statements have no bearing on the decision, as a video exists that shows you running into town hall and shouting, and because their statements are based on the assumption you had punched people. I informed a friend of yours who inquired that my DMs were open. In the following exchange, I admitted this minor mistake, and mentioned explicitly to you that it had no bearing on the punishment, a statement that you mysteriously left out of this appeal, and which is included in the below attachments. As for your first attachment, neither me nor Bingus stated you were a white male in a suit, only the unrelated people in general chat said this.
In conclusion, while yes a minor error was made in describing your offense in the general chat, it was completely unrelated to your punishment, and the idea you had been punching people emerged only after the ban, and had no effect on it. The statements of others in general chat are based on the assumption that you had been punchminging, which you weren't, and as such cannot be relied upon as a statement of your innocence.
If you have any further questions, I'm more than happy to reply and explain why this ban was valid regardless of a minor post-ban error and what two randoms in general chat said.