PK Appeal

[Mascotics]

Thrax, you can keep bending the rules all you'd like to try to bend them to fit your circumstances. When you pull stuff like this, it's "rest in piss", "we killed your man", and rap songs written about them. But, when an eye for an eye is done, you come crying foul on a forum.

My main reason there has been no evidence on here, is for protection of your own family and friends that have given you up, with evidence and proof that I was informed, In Character, that you were the one that pulled the trigger on Zane. Therefore, in return for the Forced PK (because we both know Kody did the PK on Zane even though UA told him not to, right?), I am able to escalate the situation by taking out your 2nd in Command. It's that cut, simple, dry, and to the point.

That's my last post on this thread.

Again, you do not have IC proof of elm being involved and you keep dodging it every time they ask. 

1. If you intend to retaliate for a PK against your family by another’s you must prove you have 100% certain IC knowledge that it was that family that attacked you, you then may retaliate an equal amount of PKs. Ideally you go after the hitman himself. (EVIDENCE MUST BE PROVIDED)
   What do you not understand about this? "You must prove you have 100% certain IC knowledge" and "EVIDENCE MUST BE PROVIDED".
   

I do and it's been provided to UA through a private ticket. If I didn't have proof, she'd be un-PK'ed by now, yes? I owe none of you a single thing nor am I required to put my evidence and proof here. If you read my post, you'd have seen that. How about we stop abusing staff privileges? Which, reminds me, how exactly did Thrax find out it was me who PK'd Kelly? He DM'd me within 2 minutes of the PK happening when he was no where on the server to see it himself. We'll file that under "things that make you go hmm".

Again, I have nothing else to say on this thread. All of my side of evidence has been provided to UA.