04-22-2023, 05:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-22-2023, 05:33 PM by dirty dan. Edited 3 times in total.)
(I was banned in the same sit)
A major part of the sit left out in this appeal was that both parties were found breaking the rules and had made a compromise. We offered compensation and the other party had agreed and considered everything fair and even. The two players that mugged us had been determined to be on mugging alts, enough for you to declare that any PKs made were invalid. If one party suffered an minor in-game penalty only (not getting their PKs) why didn't our offer of compensation fit the manner of the sit, especially when it was enthusiastically accepted by the only "victims" of our slip up?
Judging from these two Donator's other characters, you can easily assume that those were mugging alts:
https://steamcommunity.com/id/ExodusMal/
STEAM_0:0:560310320
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198315198391/
STEAM_0:1:177466331
However, you lessened their charge by saying they were under 'suspicion' of being mugging alts because there's no hard proof. They didn't gain their PKs, but they weren't punished with a loss in any way. I believe that same logic should apply to our accusations of metagame, there is no concrete evidence that we were metagaming and everything we did in those clips could have been done without the use of any external program. In all honesty, I think the solution should have been to PK the original victim as intended rather than ban 4 people for metagame.
A major part of the sit left out in this appeal was that both parties were found breaking the rules and had made a compromise. We offered compensation and the other party had agreed and considered everything fair and even. The two players that mugged us had been determined to be on mugging alts, enough for you to declare that any PKs made were invalid. If one party suffered an minor in-game penalty only (not getting their PKs) why didn't our offer of compensation fit the manner of the sit, especially when it was enthusiastically accepted by the only "victims" of our slip up?
Judging from these two Donator's other characters, you can easily assume that those were mugging alts:
https://steamcommunity.com/id/ExodusMal/
STEAM_0:0:560310320
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198315198391/
STEAM_0:1:177466331
However, you lessened their charge by saying they were under 'suspicion' of being mugging alts because there's no hard proof. They didn't gain their PKs, but they weren't punished with a loss in any way. I believe that same logic should apply to our accusations of metagame, there is no concrete evidence that we were metagaming and everything we did in those clips could have been done without the use of any external program. In all honesty, I think the solution should have been to PK the original victim as intended rather than ban 4 people for metagame.