11-03-2023, 05:10 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-03-2023, 05:11 AM by Canadian-bacon. Edited 1 time in total.)
If you're not disputing the validity of the PK there's no real reason to be posting an appeal. That rule/policy is specifically for the moments after a kill to prevent cringe children from screaming 'PK PK' over the mic breaking the RP of the situation. As per the example embeded in the rule.
The clip you posted is clearly well after the situation occurred and the rule doesn't appeal here. While yes, the officers are using OOC terms over mic which constitutes a small rule violation it does not grant the ability to invalidate your pk because:
1) It is well after the PK situation
2) the subject of conversation would be irrelevant/could be different entirely
3) a casual OOC conversation over mic would be a minor warning at best
4) in normal circumstances you would not be privy to hearing this conversation at all; your character would be long killed already meaning you're either listening to their conversation on another character or you were not yet pk'ed and returned to the PD despite being killed and happened to eavesdrop on the convo.
5) The use of the term 'such' as does imply multiple possible scenarios, which can be true, but this is to the determination/discretion of staff, and it would not apply here.
Basically yea the rule doesnt extend that far. Would be silly.
The clip you posted is clearly well after the situation occurred and the rule doesn't appeal here. While yes, the officers are using OOC terms over mic which constitutes a small rule violation it does not grant the ability to invalidate your pk because:
1) It is well after the PK situation
2) the subject of conversation would be irrelevant/could be different entirely
3) a casual OOC conversation over mic would be a minor warning at best
4) in normal circumstances you would not be privy to hearing this conversation at all; your character would be long killed already meaning you're either listening to their conversation on another character or you were not yet pk'ed and returned to the PD despite being killed and happened to eavesdrop on the convo.
5) The use of the term 'such' as does imply multiple possible scenarios, which can be true, but this is to the determination/discretion of staff, and it would not apply here.
Basically yea the rule doesnt extend that far. Would be silly.