11-12-2023, 05:32 PM
(11-12-2023, 03:43 PM)Yuki Wrote: Hey so im the member of staff involved with this and heres my side of the story. I was going around since there were no tickets up and I heard Edward burns say he needed a admin for a metagame case that had just happened so I replied and then was told what happened and sent the evidence. Which the primary being an ss of the man jailed saying this
“ @you i need help meet me at the police station.
Im arrested on false grounds.
Till they found dope to arrest for me for.
You responded im not even on”
You the person and one other were sitting in vc from this point,
Then you load in about 3 minutes later. After you load in there are no adverts at all but magically you run to the pd with one stop at your atm to put your gun away then charge in saying you were the lawyer. There was no one to tell you the charges as you were let in and ushered in by two detectives who hadn't told you the charges until you got into the room. Previously that had told your client ( who you were in vc and admitted to talking to) the two charges you said but the detectives had only told you one. Then started to go on about how they cant be stacked when they never told you which i agree isn't a wild stretch but when all the other evidence is at play it becomes much more reasonable. While you were in vc 2 ua members had joined since you were all still in it then as soon as they joined you were still talking and had removed them from vc and gone on deafen as you said during the sit. So with all of that information put together, I had concluded you were metagaming and to be honest you have multiple pos for metagame and the prior ban for it was a week long so I would take a peak at the rules and make sure you stop with the metagame. If you believe the actions I took were to much you always have the right to file a staff report. Have a great day!
Thank you for the speedy response. I was under the assumption, as I was told by several people that during the faction leader meeting it was OK for lawyers to be contacted via OOC channels (DMs, ect) to get online. Again, David didn't tell me the charges at all, when I entered I thought I heard "possession of illegal narcotics and possession with intention to distribute". Being a lawyer of a crime family I quite often am prepared to deal with these charges, so I may have misinterpreted what James had said at the time. I do however have that moment clipped, and I do see where my own confusion is as "intention to distribute" isn't an actual charge in the penal code, but "possession with intention to distribute" is. To reiterate, James said his charges were "possession of illegal narcotics, and intention to distribute" I interpreted that as "possession of illegal narcotics, and possession with intention to distribute" as "intention to distribute" is not a charge. I personally contacted you VIA dms as to why I was removing the UA, and frankly, I could give a rat's ass less if James or Monaclu are UA or not, they were the people who arrested the lad, Im not going to have them in a VC with him for whatever reason. Again, I reached out to your DMs as to why this is the case. I understand my other POs but to be fair there is 0 actual evidence of any metagame at play here. If I gained any information from that roleplay unfairly, I do apologize, but from my understandings from previous ruling, lawyers ARE able to be contacted OOCly to get on the server. If Rem or Canadian could shed light on this I would be grateful.